Field guide

Skeptic’s field guide

Want to believe? Good. Now rule out everything else first. Checklists, famous cases, a quiz and the best books and films from both sides.

Saw something? Go through each question. Mark it "Ruled out" if you have checked and it was not that, or "Could be" if it might explain what you saw.

Check the sky first

0 / 5

Most sightings are ordinary things in the sky seen in unusual conditions.

  1. Was Venus, Jupiter or a bright star low in that direction?
    Why it matters

    Low bright planets twinkle, change colour and seem to "follow" a moving car. Use a free sky map app for the time and place.

  2. Could it have been a Starlink "train" or the ISS?
    Why it matters

    Fresh Starlink launches look like a string of pearls crossing the sky. Pass predictions are on Heavens-Above.

  3. Did a flight tracker show an aircraft there?
    Why it matters

    Landing lights pointed at you look like a hovering, silent ball of light for minutes.

  4. Any drones, balloons or sky lanterns nearby?
    Why it matters

    Lanterns drift in groups, glow orange and fade out one by one. Weather balloons can reflect sunlight long after sunset.

  5. Was there a launch, flare drop or military exercise?
    Why it matters

    Rocket launches make spectacular glowing "jellyfish" at twilight. Flares hang and drift in a line.

Check the camera

0 / 6

Phones are brilliant at people and terrible at tiny lights in a dark sky.

  1. Is the object exactly opposite a bright light in the frame?
    Why it matters

    Lens flares sit on a line through the centre of the image, mirrored from the light source.

  2. Could it be a reflection in a window or windshield?
    Why it matters

    Shoot again with the lens pressed against the glass. If it vanishes, it was the glass.

  3. Is it a soft, see-through disc?
    Why it matters

    Out-of-focus dust, rain, insects or birds close to the lens become glowing orbs (bokeh).

  4. Was digital zoom or heavy night mode used?
    Why it matters

    Digital zoom and stacking invent detail. Shapes and "structure" can be processing, not the object.

  5. Does a fast object look bent, stretched or wobbly?
    Why it matters

    Rolling shutter distorts fast motion and spinning things, like propellers.

  6. Is the original file, with its EXIF, still available?
    Why it matters

    Screenshots and re-uploads strip metadata and recompress the image. The Capture app keeps the original sealed with a hash.

Check the story

0 / 4

Memory is a reconstruction, not a recording.

  1. Was it written down within the hour?
    Why it matters

    Accounts grow more detailed and dramatic with retelling. Early notes are worth more.

  2. Are there independent witnesses who did not talk first?
    Why it matters

    Witnesses who compare notes converge on one story without meaning to.

  3. Are the size, distance and speed actually measurable?
    Why it matters

    A light in the sky has no scale. "Huge" and "fast" are guesses unless something gives a reference.

  4. Were you expecting or hoping to see something?
    Why it matters

    Expectation shapes perception. That applies to sceptics too.

Check the evidence

0 / 3

Extraordinary claims need evidence that would convince someone who was not there.

  1. Is there more than one camera angle or sensor?
    Why it matters

    Two locations allow triangulation. That turns "a light" into a real distance and speed.

  2. Has someone tried to explain it in an ordinary way?
    Why it matters

    Ask for an explanation before calling it unexplained. "I can't identify it" is not "it can't be identified".

  3. Would the evidence still look strange to a pilot or astronomer?
    Why it matters

    Specialists recognise things the rest of us never see.

Guess each verdict before you reveal it.

1942 · Los Angeles, California, USA

Battle of Los Angeles

The claim

Weeks after Pearl Harbor, air-raid sirens sounded and anti-aircraft guns fired more than 1,400 shells at unseen targets over the city. A newspaper photo appeared to show an object caught in searchlights.

Your guess:

Probably explained

The sceptic's take

No aircraft was found and no bombs fell. The Navy called it a false alarm caused by war nerves, and a weather balloon may have started it. The famous photo was heavily retouched for publication, which made the searchlight beams appear to meet on a solid shape.

1944 · Skies over Europe and the Pacific

Foo fighters

The claim

Allied aircrews in the Second World War reported glowing balls of light that paced their planes at night.

Your guess:

Probably explained

The sceptic's take

Both sides suspected the other of secret weapons. Postwar reviews found no such weapons. The likely causes were St. Elmo's fire, reflections, flares and the stress of night combat. Each side also reported them over its own territory.

1947 · Mount Rainier, Washington, USA

Kenneth Arnold

The claim

A private pilot reported nine bright objects flying in formation at incredible speed. His description of them moving "like a saucer skipped across water" gave the world the phrase "flying saucer".

Your guess:

Still open

The sceptic's take

Arnold described the motion, not the shape, but the press ran with "saucers". Proposed explanations include a meteor fireball breaking up, a mirage of distant peaks, or a flock of birds such as pelicans. None is proven.

1947 · New Mexico, USA

Roswell

The claim

The Army announced it had recovered a "flying disc", then retracted it a day later. Decades later, stories of alien bodies and a cover-up emerged.

Your guess:

Explained

The sceptic's take

USAF reports in 1994 and 1997 concluded the debris came from Project Mogul, a classified string of balloons built to detect Soviet nuclear tests. The "alien bodies" accounts appear to blend memories of later crash-test dummy drops and other events.

1948 · Kentucky, USA

Mantell incident

The claim

Air National Guard pilot Thomas Mantell died chasing a huge, metallic object high above Godman Field.

Your guess:

Explained

The sceptic's take

Mantell climbed too high without oxygen and blacked out. The object is generally identified as a then-secret Navy Skyhook balloon, a giant high-altitude research balloon that looks metallic in sunlight.

1951 · Texas, USA

Lubbock Lights

The claim

Professors and residents saw arcs of glowing lights cross the night sky on several evenings, and a student photographed a V-shaped formation.

Your guess:

Probably explained

The sceptic's take

The Air Force concluded the lights were night-flying birds (plovers) reflecting new mercury-vapour streetlights. The photographs remain debated.

1952 · Washington, D.C., USA

Washington, D.C. flap

The claim

Radar at two airports tracked unknown targets over the capital on consecutive weekends, and jets were scrambled.

Your guess:

Probably explained

The sceptic's take

The Air Force attributed the returns to temperature inversions bending radar beams during a heatwave, combined with visual sightings of stars and meteors. Some radar specialists disputed this at the time.

1952 · West Virginia, USA

Flatwoods monster

The claim

After a fireball crossed the sky, a group of locals said they met a ten-foot creature with a glowing face and a spade-shaped hood.

Your guess:

Probably explained

The sceptic's take

The fireball was a meteor seen across three states that night. Investigators have argued that the "creature" matches a startled barn owl on a branch, with its heart-shaped face and talons, seen by flashlight by frightened witnesses.

1961 · New Hampshire, USA

Betty and Barney Hill

The claim

A couple reported a light following their car, and later, under hypnosis, recalled being taken aboard a craft and examined. It became the template for abduction stories.

Your guess:

Probably explained

The sceptic's take

The detailed abduction story only emerged through hypnosis, which is known to produce confident false memories. Their therapist did not believe it was a literal event. Sceptics suggest the original light was Jupiter or a nearby beacon.

1964 · New Mexico, USA

Socorro landing

The claim

Police officer Lonnie Zamora said he saw an egg-shaped craft with two small figures beside it, which then took off with a roar, leaving burn marks.

Your guess:

Still open

The sceptic's take

Zamora was considered a credible witness, and Project Blue Book left the case unidentified. Proposed explanations include a hoax by students and a test vehicle, but none has been confirmed.

1965 · Pennsylvania, USA

Kecksburg

The claim

A fireball came down in the woods, and witnesses later described soldiers recovering an acorn-shaped object.

Your guess:

Probably explained

The sceptic's take

The fireball was seen across several states and Canada, and its path fits a meteor that broke up well away from Kecksburg. A Soviet probe was ruled out by its orbit. Accounts of the acorn grew over decades of retelling.

1966 · Melbourne, Australia

Westall

The claim

Hundreds of students and teachers watched a silvery object descend near a school playing field, then fly away.

Your guess:

Probably explained

The sceptic's take

Researchers have linked it to the HIBAL programme, which was launching high-altitude research balloons from nearby that year. A fallen balloon followed by a search aircraft fits many accounts.

1975 · Arizona, USA

Travis Walton

The claim

A forestry worker vanished for five days after his crew saw him struck by a beam from a hovering craft.

Your guess:

Still open

The sceptic's take

There is no physical evidence. Sceptics such as Philip Klass argued it was a hoax, pointing to disputed polygraph results and a contract the crew was behind on. Walton and his crew still stand by the story.

1980 · Suffolk, England

Rendlesham Forest

The claim

US airmen reported a glowing craft in the woods near RAF Woodbridge, and later, landing marks and raised radiation.

Your guess:

Probably explained

The sceptic's take

Investigators including astronomer Ian Ridpath showed the flashing light lined up with the Orford Ness lighthouse, and the first sighting matched a bright fireball. The "landing marks" were rabbit diggings, and the radiation readings were background level.

1981 · Hessdalen valley, Norway

Hessdalen lights

The claim

Balls of light have been seen floating over a remote valley for decades, sometimes daily.

Your guess:

Still open

The sceptic's take

This is a real, recurring phenomenon and is under scientific study with automated cameras. Leading ideas are natural, such as plasma or dust ignited by the valley's minerals. It is an unexplained light, not a spacecraft.

1983 · New York, USA

Hudson Valley boomerang

The claim

Thousands of people reported a huge, silent, boomerang-shaped set of lights hovering over the Hudson Valley over several years.

Your guess:

Probably explained

The sceptic's take

Investigators traced many sightings to a group of pilots flying light aircraft in tight formation at night as a stunt, switching their lights on and off. Witnesses joined the lights into one giant craft.

1986 · Alaska, USA

Japan Air Lines 1628

The claim

A cargo jet's captain reported huge lights pacing his aircraft for almost an hour, including a walnut-shaped mothership.

Your guess:

Still open

The sceptic's take

The FAA investigated and found no corroborating radar. Sceptics such as Philip Klass argued the captain saw Jupiter and Mars, both bright and low that night. The crew's accounts differed in detail, and it remains debated.

1990 · Petit-Rechain, Belgium

Belgian UFO wave photo

The claim

During a wave of triangle sightings, a striking photo of a dark triangle with three lights became one of the most famous UFO images ever.

Your guess:

Explained

The sceptic's take

In 2011 the photographer admitted he made it from painted polystyrene and lights. Many other sightings in the wave were never resolved, though some radar contacts were attributed to weather effects.

1994 · Ruwa, Zimbabwe

Ariel School

The claim

About 60 schoolchildren said a craft landed near their playground at break time and small beings with large eyes communicated with them.

Your guess:

Still open

The sceptic's take

There is no physical evidence. Sceptics point to excitement after a bright meteor seen days earlier, the children's shared retelling and leading interviews. The children's sincerity is not in doubt, and many still describe it the same way today.

1995 · London, England

Alien Autopsy film

The claim

Grainy black-and-white footage, said to be from 1947, showed doctors dissecting an alien body from Roswell. It aired around the world.

Your guess:

Explained

The sceptic's take

In 2006 the man behind it admitted it was a staged "reconstruction". The body was a dummy filled with sheep brains, chicken guts and jelly, made in a London flat.

1997 · Arizona, USA

Phoenix Lights

The claim

Thousands saw a huge V of lights glide silently over the city, and later a row of hovering orbs.

Your guess:

Explained

The sceptic's take

The later, famously filmed orbs were illumination flares dropped by A-10 aircraft on the Barry Goldwater range during an exercise. The earlier V is best explained by aircraft flying in formation. Witnesses joined the separate lights into one giant craft.

2004 · Pacific, off California

Nimitz "Tic Tac"

The claim

Navy pilots reported a white, wingless object that moved abruptly near the USS Nimitz, and an infrared video was later released.

Your guess:

Still open

The sceptic's take

The released footage is low resolution and has been argued to show a distant aircraft. The pilots' visual accounts have not been explained, and the Pentagon still lists it as unidentified. It is the strongest open case and worth studying carefully.

2006 · Chicago, Illinois, USA

O'Hare Airport disc

The claim

Airline staff reported a dark, disc-shaped object hovering over a gate, which then shot up through the clouds and left a hole.

Your guess:

Probably explained

The sceptic's take

There was no radar contact and no photos. The FAA attributed it to a weather phenomenon. Meteorologists note that low, ragged cloud and hole-punch clouds can produce exactly this impression.

2014 · Chile

Chilean Navy video

The claim

A Navy helicopter filmed an object leaving a strange trail over the sea in infrared. Officials could not identify it.

Your guess:

Explained

The sceptic's take

Independent analysts matched it to a commercial airliner leaving Santiago, seen from far away, with its engines venting a contrail.

2015 · Atlantic, off Florida

Gimbal

The claim

A Navy targeting pod filmed a glowing object that appears to stop and rotate in mid-air.

Your guess:

Probably explained

The sceptic's take

Analysts such as Mick West argue the shape is infrared glare from a distant jet, and the "rotation" is the camera's gimbal mechanism turning. The Navy has not offered an explanation.

2015 · Atlantic, off Florida

GoFast

The claim

A Navy video seems to show a small object skimming the ocean at very high speed.

Your guess:

Explained

The sceptic's take

NASA's 2023 UAP study team calculated from the on-screen data that it was about 13,000 feet up and moving at roughly wind speed. The apparent speed is parallax from the fast jet.

2023 · USA and Canada

The 2023 shootdowns

The claim

After downing a Chinese surveillance balloon, US jets shot down three more unidentified objects in a week, prompting headlines about UFOs.

Your guess:

Probably explained

The sceptic's take

Officials later said the three smaller objects were most likely benign balloons. A hobby club reported losing a small, cheap research balloon over Alaska at the same time. Radar had been retuned to catch slow objects, so it suddenly saw many more balloons.

2023 · Mexico City, Mexico

Mexican "alien" mummies

The claim

Two small, three-fingered bodies were presented to Mexico's Congress as non-human beings.

Your guess:

Explained

The sceptic's take

Scientists who examined similar bodies from Peru found they were assembled from human and animal bones and modern glue. The presenter had previously promoted other claims that were shown to be false.

  1. 1947

    The "flying saucer" is born

    Kenneth Arnold's sighting and the Roswell announcement start a wave of reports across the US within weeks.

  2. 1948

    Project Sign

    The US Air Force begins studying reports. It is followed by Project Grudge in 1949.

  3. 1952

    Project Blue Book

    The Air Force's long-running study begins, the same year as the Washington, D.C. radar sightings.

  4. 1953

    Robertson Panel

    CIA-convened scientists conclude reports pose no direct threat but could clog defence channels. They recommend public education, and critics later call it debunking.

  5. 1968

    Condon Report

    A University of Colorado study finds nothing to justify further scientific study, though some of its own cases remain unexplained.

  6. 1969

    Blue Book closes

    Final tally: 12,618 reports, of which 701 remain unidentified.

  7. 1977

    France's GEPAN

    The French space agency CNES sets up a unit to study reports. Now called GEIPAN, it publishes case files online.

  8. 1997

    "Case Closed"

    The Air Force publishes its second Roswell report, explaining "alien body" accounts as later crash-test dummy drops and other events.

  9. 2007

    AATIP

    A small, little-known Pentagon programme begins studying unidentified aerial threats, funded until 2012.

  10. 2009

    UK closes its UFO desk

    The Ministry of Defence ends its reporting line after decades of finding no defence threat, and releases its files to the National Archives.

  11. 2017

    The New York Times story

    AATIP is revealed and the Navy's FLIR "Tic Tac" video goes public, reviving mainstream interest.

  12. 2020

    Pentagon releases the videos

    The Defense Department officially publishes the Tic Tac, Gimbal and GoFast videos.

  13. 2021

    First intelligence report

    The US intelligence community reviews 144 military reports from 2004 to 2021 and explains one, a deflating balloon. The rest lack enough data.

  14. 2022

    AARO and hearings

    The Pentagon creates AARO to investigate UAP, and Congress holds its first open hearing on the subject in more than 50 years.

  15. 2023

    Whistleblower and NASA

    A former intelligence officer testifies about alleged crash retrievals without showing evidence publicly. NASA's independent study calls for better data and less stigma.

  16. 2024

    AARO's historical review

    The Pentagon reports finding no evidence that any US government investigation has confirmed extraterrestrial technology.

1 / 12Score 0

Just after sunset, a brilliant white light hangs low in the west for an hour, flickering red and green. It seems to follow your car.

A light in the sky has no scale. Hold your arm out straight and measure the object with your hand, then see how big and fast it would be at different distances.

0.5°
2 fists
10 s
If it wasSizeSpeedAbout as big as

Same light, wildly different answers. Without a real distance, from a second camera, radar or a landmark, any claim about size or speed is a guess.

Unidentified is not the same as alien

"UFO" means one thing: someone saw something in the sky and could not say what it was. That is a statement about the witness's information, not about the object. Governments have started using "UAP" (unidentified anomalous phenomena) partly to shed the flying-saucer baggage.

Every large investigation has found the same pattern. The US Air Force's Project Blue Book logged 12,618 reports between 1952 and 1969 and left 701 as unidentified. The UK Ministry of Defence, France's GEIPAN and, more recently, the Pentagon's AARO report similar shapes: most cases are solved, and a stubborn minority stay open because the data is too thin, not because it points somewhere exotic.

An honest sceptic keeps that minority open. "We don't know" is a perfectly good answer, and it is the only one the evidence supports until something better arrives.

The usual suspects: what people really see

Venus is the all-time champion. It is the brightest thing in the night sky after the Moon, it hangs low near dusk or dawn where the atmosphere makes it flicker red and green, and it appears to pace a moving car. Police officers have chased it.

Since 2019, Starlink satellites have generated a new wave of reports: a straight line of evenly spaced lights gliding silently overhead shortly after a launch. Aircraft landing lights pointed straight at you make a bright, stationary ball for minutes. Sky lanterns drift in loose formation and blink out one at a time. Balloons, from party Mylar to high-altitude research flights, catch sunlight after the ground is dark.

Rocket launches seen at twilight create glowing, expanding plumes that look like nothing else on Earth, and they often trigger hundreds of reports in a single evening.

Your phone is lying to you (a little)

Phone cameras are computers that guess. At night they stack multiple frames, sharpen edges and smooth noise. Pointed at a single bright point, they can invent shapes, halos and "structure" that are simply processing.

Lens flares appear opposite a bright light, mirrored through the centre of the frame. Raindrops, dust, insects and birds close to the lens become glowing translucent discs. Rolling shutters, which read the sensor line by line, bend fast-moving objects and turn propellers into impossible curves.

The fix is boring and effective: keep the original file, note the time and direction, take a wide shot that includes the horizon or a landmark, and avoid digital zoom. This is exactly why Hello Mr. Alien seals every original with a SHA-256 hash.

Why smart people see saucers

Seeing something odd is not a sign of gullibility. Human vision evolved to find patterns fast and fill gaps, which is why we see faces in clouds (pareidolia) and assume a cluster of lights is one connected object.

A single light in a dark sky has no reference for size or distance. The brain picks one, and from that guess follow wrong conclusions about speed and manoeuvres. The autokinetic effect makes a fixed point of light in darkness appear to drift.

After the event, memory keeps editing. Talking to other witnesses, seeing news coverage or being hypnotised can add vivid, confident detail that was never seen. Psychologist Susan Clancy's research on people who report abductions found them sincere, not liars, which is exactly why first-hand testimony alone is not enough.

A baloney detection kit for UFO claims

Carl Sagan proposed a "baloney detection kit" in The Demon-Haunted World. Applied to UFOs, it looks something like this.

Seek independent confirmation of the facts. Encourage debate from people who know the field, such as pilots, astronomers and radar operators. Don't trust authority alone, whether it is a general or a famous researcher. Consider more than one hypothesis, and try to knock down your favourite. Quantify: how far, how fast, how big, and how do you know? Ask whether the claim could ever be shown wrong; if not, it is not really a claim.

Finally, Occam's razor: when two explanations fit the data, prefer the one that needs fewer new assumptions. A misidentified balloon needs none. Interstellar visitors need quite a few.

Steelman the believers

A good sceptic understands the strongest version of the other side. Believers point to trained military pilots, multiple sensors and governments that have been secretive about real programmes. Those are fair points.

The US Congress has held public hearings on UAP since 2022, the Navy has confirmed its videos are genuine, and NASA ran an independent study in 2023. None of them found evidence of extraterrestrial technology, but all of them called for better data, less stigma and more reporting. That is a position both sides can sign.

Use this site the same way: capture originals, record the facts, and let the evidence lead. If something truly anomalous turns up, the best people to recognise it will be the ones who ruled out everything else first.

How to report a sighting like a pro

Write it down immediately: date, exact time, where you stood, which direction you faced, and how high above the horizon the object was. Use your hand at arm's length: a fist is about 10 degrees, a finger about 1 degree. That is far more useful than "huge" or "fast".

Film wide before you zoom. A shot that includes the horizon, a roofline or a tree gives investigators a reference to measure against. Keep the camera as still as you can, ideally braced against something, and keep recording for longer than feels necessary.

Keep the original file. Do not crop, filter, screenshot or re-upload it before filing. Upload it through the Capture page, which hashes the file on your phone and again on the server so anyone can confirm it was not altered.

Finally, note anything nearby that could explain it: an airport, a launch site, a festival, a bright planet. Ruling things out is part of the report, not a sign of disbelief.

Famous hoaxes and how they were caught

In the 1950s, George Adamski photographed "scout ships" that critics identified as a chicken brooder or a lamp shade. In the 1970s and 80s, Swiss farmer Billy Meier produced beautiful saucer photos, and analysts found models hung on strings and, later, pictures copied from TV and magazines.

The Belgian triangle photo of 1990 was polystyrene and lights, as its maker admitted 21 years later. The 1995 "Alien Autopsy" was a dummy filled with animal parts. In the UK, Doug Bower and Dave Chorley revealed in 1991 that they had been making crop circles since the 1970s with planks and rope.

The pattern is useful. Hoaxes tend to come from one person with no independent witnesses, have only a single photo or a short clip, never get better with follow-up, and grow more elaborate over time. Real phenomena get easier to study, not harder.

Ghosts in the machine: radar and infrared

"It was on radar" sounds decisive, but radar has its own illusions. Temperature inversions bend beams back to the ground and produce phantom targets. Flocks of birds, insect swarms and chaff can all appear as solid contacts, and software can join separate returns into one impossible track.

Infrared cameras see heat, not shape. A distant jet engine can bloom into a glowing blob that hides the aircraft entirely, and the camera's own optics can add glare that rotates as the mount turns. That is the leading explanation of the Gimbal video.

Multiple sensors agreeing is genuinely strong evidence, which is why the best cases are taken seriously. But "multiple sensors" claims often rest on testimony about data that has never been released. Ask to see the data.

AARO
The All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office, the Pentagon office that investigates UAP reports.
Autokinetic effect
A fixed point of light in a dark sky appears to drift or move because the eye has no reference.
Bokeh
The blurred look of out-of-focus points. Dust and insects near the lens become glowing orbs.
Chain of custody
A record of who handled a piece of evidence and when. Hello Mr. Alien uses a SHA-256 hash to show a photo is unchanged.
Close encounter
J. Allen Hynek's scale: first kind is a close sighting, second kind leaves physical traces, third kind includes beings.
Confabulation
Sincerely remembering things that did not happen, often filling gaps in memory. Hypnosis can encourage it.
EXIF
Data a camera stores inside a photo: time, settings, device and often GPS location.
Falsifiable
A claim that could, in principle, be shown wrong by evidence. Claims that cannot are not testable.
FLIR
Forward-looking infrared, the heat cameras in military targeting pods that recorded the Navy videos.
GEIPAN
France's official UFO study unit, part of the space agency CNES. It publishes its cases online.
Lens flare
Light scattered inside a lens, appearing as discs or rings opposite a bright light in the frame.
Misidentification
Mistaking an ordinary thing, such as a planet, aircraft or balloon, for something unknown. The cause of most reports.
Occam's razor
When two explanations fit, prefer the one that needs fewer new assumptions.
Parallax
Apparent movement of a distant object caused by the observer's own motion. It makes slow objects look fast from a moving jet.
Pareidolia
Seeing meaningful shapes, such as faces or craft, in random patterns.
Project Blue Book
The US Air Force study of UFO reports from 1952 to 1969.
Rolling shutter
A camera reads the sensor line by line, so fast motion is bent or stretched.
SHA-256
A digital fingerprint of a file. Change a single pixel and the fingerprint changes completely.
Starlink train
A line of newly launched satellites travelling together before they spread out. A big source of modern reports.
Temperature inversion
Warm air above cool air bends light and radar, creating mirages and false radar returns.
UAP
Unidentified anomalous phenomena. The official US term since 2022, replacing UFO to include objects in the sea and in space.
UFO
Unidentified flying object. Coined by the US Air Force in the early 1950s to replace "flying saucer".

  • Sceptical

    The Demon-Haunted World

    Carl Sagan · 1995

    The classic on scientific thinking, with the "baloney detection kit" and chapters on abductions.

  • Sceptical

    Abducted: How People Come to Believe They Were Kidnapped by Aliens

    Susan A. Clancy · 2005

    A Harvard psychologist interviews abductees and explains false memory without mocking anyone.

  • Sceptical

    Escaping the Rabbit Hole

    Mick West · 2018

    How to talk to friends who believe conspiracy theories, from the man who analysed the Navy videos.

  • Sceptical

    Bad UFOs

    Robert Sheaffer · 2016

    A long-time investigator goes case by case through famous sightings.

  • Sceptical

    UFOs Explained

    Philip J. Klass · 1974

    The original hard-nosed sceptic, an aviation journalist who dissected classic cases.

  • Sceptical

    Watch the Skies!

    Curtis Peebles · 1994

    A cultural history of how the flying-saucer myth formed and spread.

  • Sceptical

    Why People Believe Weird Things

    Michael Shermer · 1997

    The psychology of belief, from the founder of Skeptic magazine.

  • Believer (steelman)

    The UFO Experience

    J. Allen Hynek · 1972

    Blue Book's scientific adviser, who started a sceptic and came to think some cases deserved study. He coined "close encounters".

  • Believer (steelman)

    UFOs: Generals, Pilots, and Government Officials Go on the Record

    Leslie Kean · 2010

    The strongest testimony-based case, from the journalist who later broke the 2017 Pentagon story.

  • Sceptical

    The UFO Handbook

    Allan Hendry · 1979

    An investigator for a pro-UFO research centre shows how nearly all of 1,300 reports he chased had ordinary causes. A practical field manual.

  • Sceptical

    The UFO Invasion

    Kendrick Frazier, Barry Karr and Joe Nickell (eds.) · 1997

    Essays from Skeptical Inquirer covering Roswell, abductions and crop circles.

  • Believer (steelman)

    Passport to Magonia

    Jacques Vallée · 1969

    A scientist argues UFO stories echo older folklore about fairies and visitors. Fascinating whichever side you take.

  • Primary source

    Project Blue Book records

    US Air Force · 1969

    12,618 reports, now in the US National Archives. Read the originals, not the retellings.

  • Primary source

    Report on the Historical Record, Vol. 1

    AARO, US Department of Defense · 2024

    The Pentagon's review of US government UAP investigations since 1945.

  • Primary source

    UAP Independent Study Team Report

    NASA · 2023

    Short, readable, and focused on what better data would look like.

  • Sceptical

    Mirage Men

    2013

    How intelligence agencies seeded UFO stories to cover secret aircraft and test disinformation.

  • Sceptical

    NOVA: Kidnapped by UFOs?

    1996

    PBS looks at abduction claims, hypnosis and memory.

  • Sceptical

    Behind the Curve

    2018

    About flat-earthers, not UFOs, but it is the best film on how communities protect a belief.

  • Primary source

    NASA UAP Public Meeting

    2023

    Four hours of scientists working through real cases, including GoFast. Free online.

  • Primary source

    US House Oversight UAP Hearing

    2023

    Pilots and a former intelligence officer testify under oath. Watch it, then ask what evidence was shown.

  • Sceptical

    Carl Sagan's Cosmos: "Encyclopaedia Galactica"

    1980

    The episode where Sagan explains why he takes the search for life seriously and UFO claims less so.

  • Believer (steelman)

    Out of the Blue

    2003

    A well-made believer documentary with many famous witnesses.

  • Believer (steelman)

    The Phenomenon

    2020

    James Fox's survey of cases and officials, including Westall.

  • Believer (steelman)

    Unidentified: Inside America's UFO Investigation

    2019

    The History series around the Navy videos and AATIP.

  • Believer (steelman)

    Encounters

    2023

    Netflix series on witness stories around the world, including Ariel School in Zimbabwe.